We accept common engineering formats:
- 3D: STEP, IGES, Parasolid, STL
- 2D: DWG, DXF, PDF
Providing a STEP model with a dimensioned 2D drawing helps us evaluate critical dimensions, datums, and inspection requirements more accurately.
Aerospace R&D, test, and ground-support parts must be evaluated against stated load, environment, material, and verification requirements. Weight, stiffness, thermal behavior, process consistency, inspection, and traceability all affect whether a build is suitable for its intended use.
Lightweight structures still need sufficient stiffness and controlled deformation for their defined loads and assembly conditions.
Typical considerations:
Vibration, temperature variation, and operating duration can change dimensions, fits, fastener behavior, and assembly stability.
Typical considerations:
Material choice, lot information, heat treatment, machining, and finishing all influence repeatability between builds.
Typical considerations:
Agreed inspection points and manufacturing records provide evidence for critical dimensions, materials, processes, and design revisions.
Typical considerations:
XFabro manufactures structural, propulsion-test, avionics, payload, cabin, tooling, and ground-support components for prototype validation and repeat builds. These examples apply to R&D, testing, ground support, and other non-flight-critical uses unless project-specific qualification and acceptance requirements are separately confirmed.
For R&D, testing, and non-flight-critical programs, a usable part must satisfy documented requirements and be repeatable—not merely manufactured to shape. We focus on structural assumptions, material and process risks, repeatability, change control, and cost.
We review load paths, thin-walled areas, and critical interfaces to identify deformation, loosening, and fatigue risks under the customer's stated conditions.
We review material behavior, heat treatment, machining, and finishing for cracking, residual stress, distortion, and property variation before the route is confirmed.
Critical dimensions, tolerance strategies, inspection points, and process routes are documented from the prototype stage to support consistent repeat builds.
Drawing revisions, critical dimensions, inspection requirements, and manufacturing records are tracked so each physical build can be related to the correct design state.
Materials and processes are selected around the stated validation and reliability needs, avoiding unnecessary complexity while preserving agreed requirements and evidence.
We accept common engineering formats:
Providing a STEP model with a dimensioned 2D drawing helps us evaluate critical dimensions, datums, and inspection requirements more accurately.
The process is selected according to geometry, material, quantity, intended use, and required evidence.
Manufacturing review does not replace customer or regulatory design validation.
Yes. Critical dimensions, inspection points, and process routes can be documented from the prototype stage to support consistent pilot and repeat builds.
Yes. We support prototype validation, low-volume pilot builds, and repeat delivery for confirmed project requirements.
Lead time depends on the process, material, finishing, inspection, documentation, and quantity. Typical targets are:
Yes. We can sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) and apply controlled access to project files and manufacturing information.